Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentOne-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareFederal contracting

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentFHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Fonteum · Learn · Updated 2026-06-21

Type 1 vs. Type 2 NPI: What’s the Difference?

  1. Home
  2. /Learn
  3. /Type 1 vs. Type 2 NPI

A Type 1 NPI identifies an individual provider — a person. A Type 2 NPI identifies an organization — a practice, agency, or hospital. Both are 10-digit numbers from the same federal NPPES registry of about 8.9M NPI records, but they enumerate different kinds of entity.

Source: CMS NPPES · Public DomainUpdated 2026-06-21

The core difference

Every NPI is enumerated as one of two entity types. The distinction is simply person versus organization — and it determines how the number is applied for, what it represents on a claim, and how it should be screened.

Type 1 — individual
  • A single human provider
  • Tied to the person, not the job
  • One Type 1 per individual, for life
  • Applied for with personal identifiers
  • Examples: physician, NP, PT, dentist
Type 2 — organization
  • A healthcare organization
  • Belongs to the entity, not a person
  • An entity can hold more than one
  • Associated with the organization’s EIN
  • Examples: group practice, hospital, agency

Type 1 — individual providers

A Type 1 NPI is the lifelong identifier for an individual clinician. It does not change when the provider switches employers, moves states, or renews a license, which is why payers and registries use it as the stable key for a person. Sole proprietors who are not incorporated typically bill under their Type 1.

Type 2 — organizations

A Type 2 NPI represents a healthcare organization as a billing entity. Large systems may enumerate multiple Type 2 NPIs for distinct subparts — separate locations, departments, or service lines — so that claims and quality data can be attributed correctly. The Type 2 is associated with the organization’s Employer Identification Number rather than any individual.

When a practice needs both

A common setup: a physician has a Type 1 for themselves and also forms a professional corporation that holds a Type 2. On a claim, the Type 2 identifies the billing organization while the Type 1 identifies the rendering individual. Getting this pairing right is essential for clean claims and for accurate provider directories.

How to tell them apart

You cannot read the type off the digits — the NPI is non-intelligent and encodes no meaning. The entity type lives in the NPPES record itself. Looking the NPI up shows whether it is an individual or an organization, along with the provider’s name or legal business name, taxonomy, and practice address — each field traceable to the federal source.

By the numbers

8.9M
NPI records in the NPPES registry (both types)
CMS NPPES · Public Domain
6.8M+
Currently-active providers in the registry
CMS NPPES · Public Domain
2,556,656
Distinct NPIs enrolled in Medicare (PECOS)
CMS PECOS · Public Domain
79,605 / 3,396
OIG-excluded individuals vs. entities
HHS-OIG LEIE · 2026-05-08

Look up an NPI

Check any NPI in the registry to see its entity type, taxonomy, and address — each field traced to the federal NPPES source.

Open the NPI lookup tool →

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a Type 1 and Type 2 NPI?
A Type 1 NPI identifies an individual provider — a person, such as a physician, nurse practitioner, or therapist. A Type 2 NPI identifies an organization — a group practice, hospital, agency, or supplier. Both are 10-digit numbers drawn from the same federal NPPES registry of roughly 8.9M NPI records, but they enumerate different kinds of entity.
Can one person have both a Type 1 and a Type 2 NPI?
Yes. An individual clinician has a Type 1 NPI for themselves. If that clinician also incorporates a solo practice or owns a group, the business gets its own Type 2 NPI. The two are distinct: the Type 1 follows the person across jobs for life, while the Type 2 belongs to the organization.
Do I need a Type 1 or a Type 2 NPI?
If you are an individual provider, you need a Type 1. If you are enumerating a healthcare organization — an incorporated practice, agency, hospital, or supplier that bills under the organization's name — you need a Type 2. Many practices need both: a Type 1 for each clinician and a Type 2 for the entity.
Is a Type 1 NPI tied to a Social Security number and a Type 2 to an EIN?
Broadly, yes. A Type 1 application uses the individual's identifying information, while a Type 2 is associated with the organization's Employer Identification Number. The NPI itself is not the SSN or EIN, though — it is a separate, non-intelligent 10-digit identifier that carries no embedded meaning.
Can you tell the type from the NPI number itself?
Not from the digits alone — the NPI is non-intelligent, so the number does not encode the type. The entity type is a separate field in the NPPES record. Looking the NPI up in the registry shows whether it is enumerated as an individual (Type 1) or an organization (Type 2), along with taxonomy and address.
Why does the individual-vs-organization distinction matter for screening?
Federal lists track both people and entities. The OIG exclusion list, for example, separates 79,605 excluded individuals from 3,396 excluded entities — the same person/organization line the NPI types draw. Screening a provider means checking the right identifier against the right entity type.

Related

  • What is an NPI number? — the full explanation of the National Provider Identifier.
  • NPI vs. provider ID, PTAN, and Tax ID — how the NPI relates to the other numbers on a form.
  • How to get an NPI number — applying for a Type 1 or Type 2 through NPPES.
  • What is a provider taxonomy code? — the classification attached to every NPI.
  • NPI lookup tool — search the registry and read the entity type for any NPI.
  • NPPES provider data — the full registry, with bulk and API access.
Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer. Review covered the distinction between the two NPI entity types, the application framing, and the scope of the NPPES registry data. Does not constitute legal, clinical, or compliance advice.
FonteumResearch Bureau. “Type 1 vs. Type 2 NPI: The Difference.” 2026-06-21. Sources: CMS NPPES, CMS PECOS, and the HHS-OIG LEIE (U.S. Government Works). Available at https://fonteum.com/learn/type-1-vs-type-2-npi.

On this page

  • The core difference
  • Type 1 — individuals
  • Type 2 — organizations
  • When you need both
  • Telling them apart
  • By the numbers
  • FAQ

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
15.7Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
5Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
70reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily count checks

Published counts are checked against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI & MCP termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Every fact Fonteum serves carries a signed, re-checkable trust mark — source, as-of date, and an Ed25519 signature travel with the data. Re-check any fact at fonteum.com/verify · the trust-mark standard (W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0, C2PA-aligned).
Request access→