Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentOne-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareFederal contracting

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentFHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Side-by-Side Comparison

Healthgrades vs Zocdoc: Side-by-Side Comparison

Healthgrades is a doctor-discovery and rating platform; Zocdoc is a real-time appointment booking network. Both help patients find providers, but they serve opposite ends of the funnel: Healthgrades is research and reviews, Zocdoc is scheduling and slot availability.

Dimension by dimension

Healthgrades vs Zocdoc, across 8 dimensions

DimensionHealthgradesZocdoc
Data typeProvider profiles, patient reviews, insurance compatibilityReal-time appointment availability, booking slots, insurance acceptance
Coverage~3 million+ provider profilesThousands of practices with live scheduling enabled; primarily urban markets
Refresh cadence— (not publicly disclosed)Real-time slot availability
License / CostFree to consumers; provider marketing packages priced privatelyFree to patients; providers pay a per-appointment or subscription fee
API accessNo public APIScheduling API available to EHR partners; not a public open API
Source provenancePatient reviews + licensing data; provenance per field not publicly documentedLive provider availability; scheduling data is real-time, not a provenance-auditable dataset
Primary use casePatient discovery, doctor research, review reading before bookingInstant appointment booking with insurance-confirmed, in-network providers
PricingFree for patients; provider packages — pricing not publicFree for patients; provider subscription — pricing not public

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use Healthgrades

Use Healthgrades when the goal is research — reading reviews, comparing specialties, or checking a provider's education and hospital affiliations before deciding whether to book.

https://www.healthgrades.com →

When to use Zocdoc

Use Zocdoc when the goal is action — booking the next available appointment online without calling the front desk. Zocdoc's value is real-time slot access, not review depth.

https://www.zocdoc.com →

FAQ

Common questions

Is Healthgrades or Zocdoc better for finding a new doctor?
They solve different problems. Healthgrades helps you evaluate providers through reviews and profile data; Zocdoc helps you book the one you've chosen. Many patients use both in sequence.
Does Zocdoc or Healthgrades have a public API for provider data?
Neither publishes a public open API for provider data. Zocdoc has an EHR scheduling integration API for partners, not a general-access provider data feed. For open programmatic access to federal provider records, CMS NPPES publishes a REST API at npiregistry.cms.hhs.gov/api with no key requirement.
How do Healthgrades and Zocdoc handle insurance eligibility?
Healthgrades shows self-reported insurance networks from provider profiles. Zocdoc confirms insurance acceptance at booking time through integrations with provider billing systems. Neither is a live real-time claims eligibility check — that requires a clearinghouse.
What is the underlying source for provider data on these platforms?
Both platforms rely primarily on self-reported provider information supplemented by state licensing records. The canonical federal identity record for any U.S. healthcare provider is the CMS NPPES NPI Registry, which is publicly downloadable and serves as the backbone for cross-source joins.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Drop our MCP server into Claude Desktop or call the API with pk_dx_sample. No signup. No credit card. Live demo key.

Add Fonteum to your agent →Request pilot access

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily count checks

Published counts are checked against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI & MCP termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Every fact Fonteum serves carries a signed, re-checkable trust mark — source, as-of date, and an Ed25519 signature travel with the data. Re-check any fact at fonteum.com/verify · the trust-mark standard (W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0, C2PA-aligned).
Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
15.7Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
5Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
13reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures