Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentOne-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareFederal contracting

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentFHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Side-by-Side Comparison

CMS Open Payments vs Definitive Healthcare: Side-by-Side Comparison

CMS Open Payments (the Sunshine Act database) is the federal disclosure of payments from pharmaceutical manufacturers and device companies to physicians and teaching hospitals — free, annual, and publicly searchable. Definitive Healthcare is an enterprise commercial platform that layers go-to-market intelligence on top of federal foundations including Open Payments. They serve different purposes: one is a disclosure requirement, the other is a commercial intelligence product.

Dimension by dimension

CMS Open Payments vs Definitive Healthcare, across 8 dimensions

DimensionCMS Open PaymentsDefinitive Healthcare
Data typeFederal physician payment disclosures — industry payments to doctors and teaching hospitalsFacility intelligence, provider profiles, technology installs, exec contacts, claims enrichment — includes Open Payments as one input
Coverage~15 million payment records annually from ~2,500 reporting manufacturers and GPOs— (not publicly disclosed)
Refresh cadenceAnnual CMS publish (calendar-year lag); Fonteum ingests each annual release— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostU.S. government public-domain works — free to redistribute with attributionEnterprise license; pricing by quote
API accessopenpaymentsdata.cms.gov bulk CSV and API; no key requiredEnterprise API; not public
Source provenanceNPI-keyed rows with publication year; SHA-256 snapshot digest on each runProprietary aggregation; field-level source lineage not publicly documented
Primary use caseFinancial relationship disclosure, conflict-of-interest research, compliance review, journalismHealthcare commercial go-to-market, facility targeting, exec outreach, sales territory planning
PricingFree (federal public domain)By quote; five- to six-figure annual licenses per external reports

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use CMS Open Payments

Use CMS Open Payments when the goal is financial relationship disclosure — looking up what a physician received from a pharma or device company, building a conflict-of-interest review, or researching Sunshine Act compliance. The data is free, federal, and annually published.

CMS Open Payments source detail →

When to use Definitive Healthcare

Use Definitive Healthcare when the goal is commercial go-to-market intelligence — territory planning, facility targeting, and executive outreach. Open Payments may appear as one input in Definitive's provider profiles, but the commercial value is in the intelligence layers above it.

https://www.definitivehc.com →

FAQ

Common questions

Is CMS Open Payments the same as the Sunshine Act?
Yes. CMS Open Payments is the database mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (Section 6002 of the ACA). Manufacturers and GPOs with products covered by Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP must report all payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals annually.
Does Definitive Healthcare include Open Payments data?
Definitive Healthcare is likely to incorporate CMS Open Payments as one of its inputs, but its specific data sourcing and field-level methodology are proprietary and not publicly documented. The Open Payments data itself is freely available at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.
Can Open Payments data be used to identify conflicts of interest in research?
Open Payments is widely used in academic research to study financial relationships between industry and physicians. Because the data is publicly available, annually updated, and NPI-keyed, it can be independently downloaded and analyzed. Researchers should note the annual publication lag — CY data is typically published roughly 5 months after calendar year-end.
What fields are in CMS Open Payments?
Key fields include the physician's NPI and name, the reporting entity, payment amount, payment nature (consulting fee, travel, food, research grant, etc.), and the associated drug or device. Fonteum ingests Open Payments annually and cross-resolves payment records against NPPES for provider identity joins.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Drop our MCP server into Claude Desktop or call the API with pk_dx_sample. No signup. No credit card. Live demo key.

Add Fonteum to your agent →Request pilot access

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily count checks

Published counts are checked against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI & MCP termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Every fact Fonteum serves carries a signed, re-checkable trust mark — source, as-of date, and an Ed25519 signature travel with the data. Re-check any fact at fonteum.com/verify · the trust-mark standard (W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0, C2PA-aligned).
Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
15.7Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
5Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
13reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures