Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentOne-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareFederal contracting

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentFHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · Georgia

Georgia dialysis facilities: 361 Medicare-certified, 5-star quality data, chain-ownership transparency.

CMS-published 5-star ratings, profit-vs-nonprofit status, chain affiliation, and service offerings (in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal, home hemodialysis training) for every ESRD facility in Georgia.

Cross-check at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·361 Medicare-certified dialysis facilities in Georgia · 93.4% chain-owned·CMS Care Compare — Dialysis·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-modified 2026-03-25 · Quality measures suppressed when <11 patients in measure period · ICH CAHPS patient-experience measures are a separate CMS dataset, not included in this snapshot

Chain concentration — Georgia

Dialysis is the most consolidated category in CMS Care Compare. 93.4% of Georgia facilities are chain-owned; here are the largest chains by facility count in this state.

DaVita
139
Fresenius Medical Care
111
US Renal Care, Inc.
27
Independent
24

Dialysis facilities — Georgia

Showing 25 of 361 Medicare-certified facilities, highest CMS 5-star rating first (334 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume and shown without a star).

FacilityCityChain5-Star ★
Fmc - renal care center of marietta bmaMARIETTAFresenius Medical Care5
Dci - columbus home dialysisCOLUMBUSDialysis Clinic, Inc.5
Fresenius medical care gwinnett homeLAWRENCEVILLEFresenius Medical Care5
Fmc dialysis services newtonCOVINGTONFresenius Medical Care5
Fmc dialysis services woodstockWOODSTOCKFresenius Medical Care5
Davita spivey peritoneal and home dialysis centerSTOCKBRIDGEDaVita5
Fresenius kidney care north georgiaRINGGOLDFresenius Medical Care5
Fresenius medical care berkeley lakeDULUTHFresenius Medical Care5
Davita turner hill dialysisLITHONIADaVita5
Davita mcfarland dialysisALPHARETTADaVita5
Davita northeast georgia home training (pd)GAINESVILLEDaVita5
Fresenius kidney care johns creekSuwaneeFresenius Medical Care5
Fmc of dekalb gwinnett incDECATURFresenius Medical Care4
Davita elberton dialysis centerELBERTONDaVita4
Fmc renal care center of north georgia bmaCANTONFresenius Medical Care4
Fresenius medical care warner robins homeWARNER ROBINSFresenius Medical Care4
Fmc - perimeter dialysis centerATLANTAFresenius Medical Care4
Fmc - bma of cartersvilleCARTERSVILLEFresenius Medical Care4
Fresenius medical care conyersCONYERSFresenius Medical Care4
Fresenius kidney care gordon countyCALHOUNFresenius Medical Care4
Fresenius medical care hall countyGAINESVILLEFresenius Medical Care4
Fmc - rcg gainesvilleGAINESVILLEFresenius Medical Care4
Davita snapfinger dialysisDECATURDaVita4
Fresenius medical care douglas countyDOUGLASVILLEFresenius Medical Care4
Davita buford dialysisBUFORDDaVita4

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily count checks

Published counts are checked against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI & MCP termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Every fact Fonteum serves carries a signed, re-checkable trust mark — source, as-of date, and an Ed25519 signature travel with the data. Re-check any fact at fonteum.com/verify · the trust-mark standard (W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0, C2PA-aligned).
Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
15.7Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
5Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
13reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures